Do Not Train Your AI Replacement! LEt the DIvide WIDEN

Do not contribute to the demise of women's jobs by being an AI trainer. First of all, the pay is rotten at $15/hour; but, even more than that, you will be training your replacement and eventually given a pink slip. Only a very short-sighted person would take the money and never give a thought to how women will be displaced in all jobs that are customer-forward due to "greater efficiency" ...which is also insulting. See the results of the Revelio study: https://www.interface-eu.org/publications/ai-gender-gap The higher a woman goes up the ladder, the less she is inclined to use AI. Smart women are not jumping on the bandwagon according to Revelio's recent study [graph below].

AI content lacks innovative ideas, human compassion, key insights--the human touch. It's vanilla icecream with no toppings masquerading as sundae. Entire books are being written by AI, which is why they no longer tug at the heartstrings or even have an overriding theme with memorable characters. They have no "voice" and no recognizable "tone" to carry you through more than ten pages.

Too many American companies have FORCED their employees to train their CHEAPER replacements  from foreign countries; surely you remember that from just ten years ago?  This is an identical scenario with American companies forcing primarily women to train AI to have compassion and customer-service skills; and, when they do, they won't need women any longer. https://www.axios.com/2019/12/29/trump-att-outsourcing-h1b-visa-foreign-workers Smell the coffee, ladies: 79 per cent of working women are employed in occupations susceptible to AI disruption and automation.